Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Search representations
Results for D2 Planning Limited search
New searchSupport
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 11b - If no, do you support Option 1B? Yes/No; If yes, please explain why. If you support the release of further employment land for housing, what should the characteristics of these employm
Representation ID: 264
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: D2 Planning Limited
LCP support Option 1B which enables a restructuring of other existing growth networks to enable more occupied employment land to be identified for housing
LCP support Option 1B which enables a restructuring of other existing growth networks to enable more occupied employment land to be identified for housing
Support
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 11c - Are there any current employment areas that might be considered suitable for redevelopment to housing? Yes/No; Please submit specific sites through the 'call for sites' form.
Representation ID: 265
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: D2 Planning Limited
LCP are scheduling a review of their employment portfolio with a view to advising if there are any surplus sites which could be available for housing.
LCP are scheduling a review of their employment portfolio with a view to advising if there are any surplus sites which could be available for housing.
Object
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 16 - Do you support Spatial Option E1? Yes/No; What type of sites are needed to meet the needs of industry and what criteria should be used to select sites? (e.g. quick motorway access) If yo
Representation ID: 266
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: D2 Planning Limited
LCP believe that consideration should be given to the expansion of existing employment sites firstly on land within the urban fringe/Green Belt.
LCP believe that consideration should be given to the expansion of existing employment sites firstly on land within the urban fringe/Green Belt.
Support
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 20 - Do you think there are any other deliverable and sustainable Employment Land Spatial Options? Yes/No; If yes, please provide details.
Representation ID: 267
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: D2 Planning Limited
There are a range of opportunities to provide new employment with existing industrial sites through rationalisation and redevelopment opportunities. Such consideration should be included as part of the overall future requirements.
There are a range of opportunities to provide new employment with existing industrial sites through rationalisation and redevelopment opportunities. Such consideration should be included as part of the overall future requirements.
Object
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 31 - Do you think that the right scale and form of funding is available to support the delivery of the Core Strategy review? Yes/No; If no, what alternative sources of funding or delivery mec
Representation ID: 268
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: D2 Planning Limited
LCP do not think that the right scale and form of funding is available. At the moment funding of development is left predominantly to the private sector to provide. There is little or no help from the public sector.
LCP do not think that the right scale and form of funding is available. At the moment funding of development is left predominantly to the private sector to provide. There is little or no help from the public sector.
Object
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 35 - Do you support the proposed approach to housing land supply? Yes/No; If no, please explain why.
Representation ID: 269
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: D2 Planning Limited
LCP believe that the Core Strategy should identify the full Objectively Assessed Housing Need for both open market and affordable housing and look to identify sufficient land to meet that need.
LCP believe that the Core Strategy should identify the full Objectively Assessed Housing Need for both open market and affordable housing and look to identify sufficient land to meet that need.
Support
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 36 - Do you think that the current accessibility and density standards set out in Policy HOU2 and Table 8 should be changed? Yes/No; If yes, what standards should be applied instead, for exam
Representation ID: 270
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: D2 Planning Limited
LCP believe that density standards are not required and should be deleted.
LCP believe that density standards are not required and should be deleted.
Object
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 42 - Do you agree that the annual affordable homes target should be increased to reflect the 2017 Black Country Strategic Housing Market Assessment? Yes/No; If no, please explain why.
Representation ID: 271
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: D2 Planning Limited
LCP agree that there is a requirement to meet affordable housing needs. However, the issue relates to how any increase in affordable housing targets will impact on the viability of schemes coming forward and ultimately deliverability of housing.
LCP agree that there is a requirement to meet affordable housing needs. However, the issue relates to how any increase in affordable housing targets will impact on the viability of schemes coming forward and ultimately deliverability of housing.
Support
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 43a - Do you think that the existing Policy HOU3 site size threshold should be kept at 15 homes or more? Yes/No; If no, please explain why.
Representation ID: 272
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: D2 Planning Limited
LCP consider that the threshold for affordable housing should be retained at 15 dwellings.
LCP consider that the threshold for affordable housing should be retained at 15 dwellings.
Support
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 44a - Do you think that the affordable housing requirement for eligible sites in Question 43 should be kept at 25% of the total number of homes on the site? Yes /No; Any Further comments.
Representation ID: 273
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: D2 Planning Limited
LCP believe that the affordable housing requirement for eligible sites should be kept at 25% of the total number of sites.
LCP believe that the affordable housing requirement for eligible sites should be kept at 25% of the total number of sites.
