Object

Representation ID: 22428

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mr Michael Novak

Loss of Green Belt:
Use old factory sites known as Brownfield to re-develop inner cities and revive town centres.
This is valuable and useful Agricultural land graded 3 and above.
The visual amenity and character of the area would change dramatically.
It is an important and strategic tract of green belt preventing urban sprawl along the Western Edge of the Black Country. If the proposed A449 Kidderminster Road forms the amended Green Belt boundary then all the Greenfield sites encompassed by that on the boundary and currently vulnerable from the South Staffs Local Plan would be at risk from development as a precedent would be set for a new boundary.
Quality of Life:
Developing green belt means loss of access to countryside, once it's gone, it's gone.
Higher noise pollution impacting on adjoining residents and wildlife.
Increase in light pollution in much needed area of tranquillity.
Poorer air quality impacting adjoining residents and wider area, particularly from increase in traffic.
Impact of building from construction noise and traffic.
Impact on traffic and transport:
Increase of vehicles means increased pollution with road safety consequences.
Road traffic congestion in the area is already high. A449 and A491 gridlocked in the morning. We do not want more roads eg 'Western Strategic (Orbital) Route' destroying more green belt.
Lack of public transport or cycle routes. Hasen rate this area as having the worst commuting score from homes to places of employment.
Poor raid access. Time taken to reach the rail network to Wolverhampton/Birmingham is much longer than 30 minutes.
There are also at least two other major development sites at Stallings Lane and Ketley Quarry (within 2 miles) which do not have any infrastructure improvements either.
Pressure on local facilities:
There are not enough doctors surgeries, schools, emergency services in Dudley to serve the area. The proposal to build 533 new houses on The Triangle would increase the local population by 1279 (Office of National statistics average occupation rates are 2.4 people per household).
Local Health Services are already oversubscribed and un-sustainable.
Primary Schools over 15 minutes walk away.
Road Infrastructure already struggling to cope at present with high traffic levels, Impact on the wider road network particularly Kingswinford and Wall Heath junctions.
No suitable or regular bus routes or cycle network.
No nearby employment sites or network.
Providing more expensive housing does not solve the problem of lack of affordable or social housing, which would also need a sustainable infrastructure of health facilities, education, mass transit and employment centres.
Destruction of the local environment:
Loss of ancient trees, natural habitats, biodiversity.
Loss of Site of Local Importance for Nature Conservation and headgrows to create access.
This will contribute to climate change.
Loss of wildlife, impact on the fields and meadows
Loss of wildlife corridors linking green spaces.
Flood risk affecting drainage of the area and ground water.
Contributing to rapid loss of species in Britain in recent decades, eg. Moths, butterflies, bees have declined significantly.
Replanting schemes do not replace ancient habitats and features.
Important locally:
Local people love and appreciate this green belt area and want it to remain for future generations. Important local green space, valuable trees, hedgerows and open fields. Many trees have Tree Preservation Orders.
Site of local Importance for Nature Conservation, 'Ashwood Haye Fields' -hedgerow and around the perimeter of the site and some within the site.
It is next to an important woodland Ridgehill Woods, which will be hugely impacted. Disrupting the wildlife corridors and surrounding habitats for these would be irreversible.
It is part of the Mid Severn Sandstone Plateau - important for habitat conservation.
Legislation:
The National Planning Policy Framework (the Government's planning policies) says "where significant development of agricultural land is demonstrated to be necessary, areas of poorer quality should be preferred to those of higher quality" and identified that:
• Sites of biodiversity should be protected and any impacts minimised (para 170)
• Land with the least environmental or amenity value should be considered for development and habitat networks and green infrastructure should be maintained and enhanced (para 171)
• Protect and enhance biodiversity and geodiversity and safeguard local wildlife-rich habitats and priority habitats and species and ecological networks (para 174)
• Inappropriate development is, by definition, harmful to the Green Belt and should not be approved except in very special circumstances (para 147).