Object

Draft Black Country Plan

Representation ID: 17944

Received: 10/10/2021

Respondent: Mr Matthew Young

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

We are writing regarding policy WSA7 - Calderfields West, Land at Aldridge Road, Walsall, under the burough of Walsall Council (REF WAH242).

We strongly object to the proposed building development site on this green belt land. we are extremely concerned with this proposal.

Firstly, the area in question frequently floods with heavy rain, with a lot of standing water visible on the fields. If the area were to be developed, we are very concerned that this water run off will affect our property and others around us. We are also concerned that this large development will greatly affect our local amenities, as well as putting more pressure on the already congested local roads. The Melish Road, which this proposed development would feed onto, is consistently gridlocked down at the roundabout at peak times, and more housing will only add to this traffic. We are also concerned that more cars will begin to park along the roads, including along our road, which is already very busy with parked cars.

Additionally, we are extremely disappointment with the proposal and the lack of consideration that this is green belt land. The area in question is one of significant beauty, as well as the home to many different types of wildlife. Considering there are many brownfield sites around Walsall that could be developed without this impact on biodiversity and natural beauty, it is particularly disappointing that a number of greenbelt developments, including this one, are being proposed.

Finally, and one of the main reasons for purchasing our house was the view over the back and the privacy it offers us, with nobody overlooking our garden. This would obviously not be the case with a building site and then large number of homes, significantly affecting the view, the peacefullness in the garden, and the value of our home.

As lifelong residents in Walsall, we hope that this proposal is abandoned for a more suitable one elsewhere. We realise more housing is required, but feel that other, less impactful sites should be utilised. If this proposal continues to the next phase however, we are prepared to join with our local community (who are already voicing strong objections) in fighting this all the way!