Object

Representation ID: 13171

Received: 10/10/2021

Respondent: J & Nigel Beck

[Site Ref: WAH237]
I strongly object to the earmarking of green belt sites for housing development unless it can be shown to be the only viable alternative and ecologically defensible. The first call on housing should always be in reclaiming derelict and neglected brownfield sites, whatever the cost of decontamination.
For future generations, given that G.B. has been identified as one of the highest nature depleted countries in the planet, to say nothing of the challenges of global warming, it is imperative that previous green belt and open spaces are preserved.
As a case in point are the plans for a large housing site in Aldridge to the rear of properties on Lazy Hill Road. The green belt site with farmland, wildlife and mature trees is much values in itself and protects urban sprawl. The site was not listed for housing development in the Black Country consultation document distributed in our area.
This proposed site is in a Mineral Safeguarding Area of the extraction of bedrock, sand and gravel which would take place before any development. Further environmental damage if therefore inevitable.
Questions regarding the necessary development of community facilities and infrastructure for Aldridge as a whole that this sizeable development would necessitate have not been addressed in any way.
Answers were not forthcoming at a recent afternoon consultation organised by Walsall Council, but not well advertised held, in Aldridge to these or other questions.