Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Not Provided.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Charitable type grants will be required as this is is not a commercial proposal.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Brief initial discussion with Michele Grant, Senior Planner at Wolverhampton City Council

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The Trustees wish to continue the existing use of the site as a community centre.

The Centre has had to change its operating base in recent times from being a Council-led service to become more of a social enterprise. Its ability to survive is dependent on generating income and in the long term this will require some extensions to the existing building, and the concern is that these may be restricted by Green Belt status.

In planning terms Green Belt designation seems inappropriate for a site that was previously part of the Courtaulds factory complex and is now more than 50% taken up by a building and hard surface car parking. In this respect the site is as much brownfield as countryside.
When assessing the site against the stated aims of the Green Belt in the National Planning Policy Framework there does not seem to be a case for its retention.
1) The location of the Centre is essentially urban green space adjacent to a local nature reserve and in no way would removal of the site from the Green Belt create urban sprawl. Instead allowing the Centre to expand would enable more work to be done to maintain the SLINC and adjacent green spaces.
2) The removal of this small site from the Green Belt would not mean that neighbouring towns merged into each other.
3) In no way would removal of the site from the Green Belt impact on the countryside.
4) There is no question of the existing designation protecting any historic town.
5) The current Green Belt designation actually restricts the urban regeneration of the highly deprived Whitmore Reans neighbourhood in which the Centre is located.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #24

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Ketley Quarry

Site Address

Dudley Road
Kingswinford

Site Postcode

DY6 8WT

Site Area in Hectares

The restoration of the site is not yet complete, however some of the site where mineral extraction has not taken place could be made available before completion of restoration of the site

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

Not Provided.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

It is believed the site would provide an immediate opportunity to deliver much needed housing on the edge of the Black Country in a sustainable location with good transport links. The site is under one ownership and could be considered as a standalone site, or as part of a wider area of development for Green Belt release.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

will depend on final layout. Good infrastructure already in place

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Not known at this stage

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Dudley Council consulted - hence filling in this application.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is in joint council areas bordering Dudley & South Staffs. Access would have to be from Dudley side.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #36

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

Not Provided.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

planning application 13/1055

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

We believe a small development of 4/5 houses would enhance the area and provide good access into the main public open space to the rear of the site. It would also eliminate fly tipping and anti social behaviour.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #37

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #39

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Not Provided.

Please provide supporting details for the above.

Not Provided.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Not Provided.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #40

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Not Provided.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is in the ownership of Sandwell MBC

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #41

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

No as a green field site with no significant infrastructure problems the site is viable and deliverable.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is available and deliverable and within 500 metres of the Wolverhampton MBC boundary.

It has been subject to detailed scrutiny as part of the South Staffs DC site allocation processes and not been found wanting in any regard.

Of the possible sites to serve Perton's future growth it is the closest to the existing settlement and has direct footpath and cycle way links to all the local facilities including schools, shops and medical facilities.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #44

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Land at Wilderness Lane / Greenhill Gardens B43 7TB

Site Address

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

Not Provided.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

No viability difficulty envisaged

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is folded into the urban area and contributes little to fundamental Green Belt objectives, being separated from the wider Green Belt by the nearby Academy. It is visually separated from the wider Green Belt, and for this reason affords little or no contribution to the five aims of Green Belt policy.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

None of the above.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

No.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Recent refusal of planning permission on Green Belt issues only. Planning Ref: P17/0140

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Please see Site Location Plan and Site Layout Plan attached.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #46

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Not Provided.

Please provide supporting details for the above.

The land is on a main rd, but a whole new estate would be build to accommodate the houses. Schools are close by, as are local shops and Sutton Park

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Horse grazing - no public access

What use or mix of uses do you propose for this site? Please tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

If housing or employment is proposed, please specify how many homes or how many hectares of employment land you think could be accommodated on the site.

Grassy Lane indicative layout.pdf

Site ID #48

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Land north of Vicarage Road, Amblecote. Stourbridge.

Site Address

Land north of Vicarage Road, Amblecote. Stourbridge.

As a development site the site does not have a post code. Nearest property given below.

Site Postcode

DY8 4JB

Site Area in Hectares

5.72

Site Area in Hectares of land suitable for development, if different to above

Please provide a brief summary of the current use(s) of this site or last known lawful use(s)

No. as a green field site with drainage and utilities nearby no viability issues are expected.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Pre application discussions ongoing with Dudley MBC planners.
Jenny North
Senior Planning Officer – South Area Team
Place Directorate
Dudley MBC

Tel: 01384 816879

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is very likley to be shortly declared surplus to requirements and can come forward for residential development.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #49

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

237 Watling Street

Site Address

237 Watling Street
Brownhills
Walsall

Site Postcode

WS8 6JR

Site Area in Hectares

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site lies within the Green Belt. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) says Green Belt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances, through the preparation or review of the Local Plan. At that time, regard should be had to their intended permanence in the long term, so they should be capable of enduring beyond the plan period (NPPF paragraph 83). This review of the Plan is the right time to review boundaries as there is a need to find land for housing during the plan period. In addition, the boundaries should be considered in the light of needs beyond the plan period and land safeguarded for long term needs.

Green Belt serves five purposes (NPPF paragraph 80). This site is assessed against each as follows.

1. To check the unrestricted sprawl of large built up areas:

The site lies on the edge of the built-up area of Brownhills and although development of the site would be an extension, it would consolidate existing uses and would not extend new development into locations that are currently open and unaffected by development. The site itself comprises existing buildings in residential, agricultural and commercial use along with agricultural land. To the north of the site on Watling Street (A5) is existing residential and commercial development that contains the site. To the west are buildings fronting the B5011. To the south is Anglesey Branch canal beyond which lies substantial buildings on an industrial estate and the area of the site that does not adjoin the canal is bounded by a permanent mobile home park fronting Lichfield Road and a narrow finger of agricultural land. To the east is agricultural land that slopes down to the traffic island of Watling Street (A5) / Hanney Hay Road / Barracks Lane. Development would not breach the established north eastern extent of urbanisation of New Town, Brownhills.

The boundaries are robust, defensible and permanent, they would contain development.

2. To prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another:

Chasetown is the nearest settlement to the north and is 1.2km from the site. The intervening area is interrupted by development along the north side of the Watling Street and by land being worked for minerals. The physical distance between the existing settlement edges would not be reduced as a result of development.

Hammerwich is the nearest settlement to the north east and is 1.3km from the site. Existing development around New Town on Watling Street and the mobile home park on Lichfield Road mean the physical distance between existing sporadic development would not be reduced as a result of development.

3. To assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment:

The introduction of development within any area of countryside would inevitably have an impact. However, encroachment will be perceived within a limited envelope as it will be viewed in the context of existing development visible around all sides of the site. The site does not extend beyond existing built development and this containment by other buildings limits the perception of encroachment.

4. To preserve the setting and special character of historic towns:

There are no historic towns in the vicinity.

5. To assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land:
The site is on the edge of the built up area with the western and part of the southern boundary adjoining non-Green Belt land. It contains a small element of brownfield land.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Not Provided.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

ELIZABETH VESTY - 2014/5 - SITE A OFFERED TO DUDLEY MBC SHLAA

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

SITES ARE GENTLY SLOPING AND HAVE SAND/ SANDSTONE SUBSTRATA MAKING FOUNDATION WORK VERY ECONOMIC. LINEAR SHAPE OF SITES SUITS INDIVIDUAL FRONTAL ACCESS MINIMISING NEED FOR `ON SITE` ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS. NO NEIGHBOURING USES THAT WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE DEVELOPMENT AS MARKET RESIDENTIAL UNITS.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #54

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Approaches have been received from agents acting on behalf of a number of major house builders seeking option agreements and/or land promotion agreements.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Whilst this has not occurred within our ownership of the site we are aware that previous "Call for Sites" submissions have been made in respect of the land to South Staffordshire District Council as part of their own internal SHLAA reviews. Site has only been in current ownership since early 2013.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Due to the site's proximity to the neighbouring electricity sub-station and as part of the broader Electricity Market Reforms currently being undertaken in early 2015 all of the neighbouring houses along Langley Road (approximately numbered 96-108) were approached and invited to indicate their preferences in terms of development options for the site.

The options presented included all for which previous suggestions had been made prior to our ownership (Housing, Crematorium/Cemetery and Gypsy/Traveller Site) plus those available through Electricity Market Reform (Large Solar Array/Battery Storage). Approximately 90% responded with the vast majority approving EMR options and almost universally opposed to the other options.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Private road/Access for new properties.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Development cannot take place until existing tenant vacates the land.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

Not Provided.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

No.

DY3 1BZ

Site Area in Hectares

Site Area in Hectares of land suitable for development, if different to above

Not Provided.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Not Provided.

Non illuminated Nursery Signs
Wolverhampton College Wulfrun Campus Paget Road Wolverhampton West Midlands WV6 0DU
Ref. No: 13/00140/ADV | Received: Thu 14 Feb 2013 | Validated: Tue 26 Feb 2013 | Status: Decided

1 No. Lime tree - reduce crown by a third.
Wolverhampton College Wulfrun Campus Paget Road Wolverhampton WV6 0DU
Ref. No: TREE/0143/11/TR | Received: Tue 23 Aug 2011 | Validated: Tue 23 Aug 2011 | Status: Decided

Extension to existing motor vehicle workshop and service yard, new access ramp, fencing and flue system.
Wolverhampton College Wulfrun Campus Paget Road Wolverhampton West Midlands WV6 0DU
Ref. No: 10/00472/FUL | Received: Tue 27 Apr 2010 | Validated: Tue 27 Apr 2010 | Status: Decided

Single storey extension to dining hall and new access ramps.
Wolverhampton College Wulfrun Campus Paget Road Wolverhampton WV6 0DU
Ref. No: 10/00341/FUL | Received: Tue 23 Mar 2010 | Validated: Thu 15 Apr 2010 | Status: Decided

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Existing further education facility needs to relocate to an identified site within the locality so latest anticipated commencement of development would be 2021.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

Interest has been shown by a national house builder.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

No.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

In March 2016 City of Wolverhampton College had discussions with the Head of Planning (Stephen Alexander) and the Development Manager for the Homes and Communities Agency (Stuart Buckley).

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site provides a short to medium term opportunity to develop 96 dwellings in this location. The allocation of this site for residential development will allow the existing college to relocate to new purpose built accommodation upgrading their offering to further education students.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #59

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Not Provided.

Please provide supporting details for the above.

Not Provided.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

No.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Site presents an opportunity to develop circa 130 dwellings in the short term subject to planning and could form part of a wider residential led scheme.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #60

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

A public footpath crosses the site east to west from the access onto Walsall Road

No previous activity known but the land (and adjoining land has the benefit of a 'dormant' planning permission for brick clay extraction

As indicated above, planning permission exists for the extraction of Brick Clay on the Highfields North Site. This accords with national planning policy which seeks to retain these finite resources to meet the demands of future generations.
It has previously been acknowledged by all parties (Company and Council) that the site is not without its challenges but this does not detract from its value as a finite and diminishing resource (especially given the situation regarding raw material supplies available to Walsall’s existing brickworks which was fully explained in Walsall's Local Plan Site Allocation Document).
The remainder of the land covered by the extraction permission (ie excluding the site now being promoted) is also subject to a designation as an SSSI (a designation which post-dated the grant of permission)
Current policies seek to impose significant restrictions on the manner in which the site can be worked and restored, but it must be borne in mind that the working of the site is very much controlled by the structure, quality and content of the underlying mineral deposit. Given the restricted nature of the site and the vagaries of the deposit it is highly unlikely that the site could be viably worked without disturbing the whole of the SSSI designation within it – either for extraction purposes or overburden storage.
Mineral extraction within this site will therefore destroy the site’s special features but policies require that the entirety of the worked area covered by the SSSI designation must be restored to recreated wildlife habitats, of similar or enhanced value to those currently present. There is a clear inconsistency here.
The fundamental point is that the two elements (clay extraction and safeguarding of the SSSI are totally incompatible). The requirements relating to the SSSI would render the site working unviable at considerable financial disadvantage to the Company.
Securing development on this site has the potential to safeguard the whole of the existing SSSI.

Protected habitats - see above. The adjoining land forms part of the Jockey Fields SSSI.

Is the site agricultural land? If so, then what is the agricultural landclassification? Please provide survey results, including mapping.

Not Provided.

If there is a current use of the site that needs to be relocated what arrangements are required to achieve this relocation? e.g. manufacturer currently on the site needs to move to a building of xx square meters with good access to the motorway.

What new infrastructure do you think will be required to support the development of the site?

2.5

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Walsall Council during consultation on their Local Plan Site Allocations Document

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

There is a clear conflict of interests on the wider Highfields site and this goes beyond the Extraction/SSSI difficulty. The passage of time since the original extraction permission has introduced other areas of concern - increased housing land in the locality, increased traffic on the local road network and likely impact of introducing significant heavy goods traffic activity for many years to come. Developing this small area would make it possible to secure the safeguarding of the SSSI.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #61

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Amenity uses are available for immediate development subject to planning consent.

What new infrastructure do you think will be required to support the development of the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Maybe due to mining

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

WALSALL Mbc a joint venture using adjacent land for WBC which doubled the acreage

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

With waterside and close proximity to town centre ideal location for residential development for Walsall.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #63

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The land is located with the South Staffs District Council though adjoins the boundary with Black Country / Wolverhampton City boundary

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #64

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

n/a

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

n/a

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

n/a

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

n/a

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The subject site is in a sustainable location in the sense that the site is within Tettenhall's Settlement Boundary and directly adjacent to Codsall Road and Crestwood Glen Bus Stop that provides frequent direct bus services to Codsall Town Centre and Wolverhampton City Centre. The subject site has no physical constraints and subject to the site's release from the Green Belt it would offer a deliverable and an available site that should be allocated for housing development.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

n/a

The subject site has no physical constraints and is sustainably located on the outskirts of the existing urban area of Wolverhampton. And subject to the site's release from the Green Belt it would offer a deliverable and an available site that should be allocated for housing development.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #66

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Cookley Works

Site Address

Leys Road
Brockmoor

Site Postcode

Not Provided.

If yes, please provide details.

N/A

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

N/A

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

An agreement is being finalised with a national house builder

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

The level of contamination and removal of the concrete slab that covers the site have significant cost implications. A viability appraisal has been undertaken and a reduction in the affordable housing requirement is likely to be necessary to make the development viable.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

The site has been promoted for development through the Dudley Development Strategy. This resulted in the site being allocated in the plan – Ref. H11B.1

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is in a suitable and sustainable location for development. It already benefits from a residential allocation and the landowner remains committed to bringing the site forward for housing.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #67

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Unknown - to be determined by the developer.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Pre-application discussions have been held with officers at DMBC (the case officer is Jenny North). Technical and design matters have been discussed. A planning application is being prepared.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is allocated for residential development in the adopted Dudley Borough Development Strategy.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #70

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Land at Former goscote hospital Site

Site Address

LAND AT FORMER GOSCOTE HOSPITAL SITE, GOSCOTE LANE, WALSALL, WS3 1SJ

Site Postcode

WS3 1SJ

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Not known at this stage

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

This site is being promoted to provide additional residential development and/or care home uses, subject to parts of the site being declared surplus to the operational healthcare requirements of the NHS (confirmation expected within 12 months).

Add any documents supporting your submission

Site ID #71

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

The ownership of the site is straightforward and therefore deliverable, as it is owned by one family. They have granted a long term option to Peter Maddox and Associates to promote the site and carry out the development.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Coven is identified by South Staffordshire Council as a ‘Local Service Village’, and the site has been identified in the South Staffordshire Site Allocations Publication Plan as ‘Safeguarded Land’ (reference 082). Given the advanced stage of the Site Allocation Document, it is asserted that the Council is supportive in principle of revisiting the Green Belt boundary at this location. Discussions have been held with Kelly Harris at South Staffordshire Council, and in allocating the site as 'Safeguarded Land' they consider the site is deliverable.

By virtue of confirming in writing the sale of the land to access the development site, it is considered that the Parish Council are also supportive of releasing land from the Green Belt at this location.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is approximately 0.3km from the s St Paul’s C of E First school and nursery, which is located on School Lane, and 0.6km from the village centre which includes local convenience stores, a post office and a public house.

The site is within close proximity of industrial and employment sites including Four Ashes Industrial Estate, Wolverhampton Business Park, Hilton Main Industrial Estate and i54 Enterprise Zone.

Bounded by the A449, Stafford is approximately 10.6 miles away and Wolverhampton 5.8 miles away. The A449 also provides access to the junction 2 of the M54, which is two miles from the site, and the A5 is within 2.3 miles of the site which provides access to the M6.

The A449 provides a strong, defensible and definitive boundary for any revised Green Belt Boundary at this location. We are not aware of any constraints to the site which would prevent development such as restrictive covenants, public rights of way, flood risk, physical constraints including topography or trees or contamination affecting the site. The site is therefore available immediately.

Add any documents supporting your submission

Coven Call for Sites Package .pdf

Non-other than those that would be sought through S106 planning obligations or CIL such as a Travel Plan and public transport contributions

The site is boarded by the village on three sides, with the hedge and house to the south providing a clear definitive boundary, where the land rises.

Discussions have been held with Staffordshire County Council Highways department, and they have no objection to the access, from Moor Lane.

Discussions have been held with Claverley Medical Practice, with regard to providing a medical centre on part of the site, as currently this is provided in an annex to a dwelling in the village.

An Agricultural Land Classification report has been commissioned which confirms that the site is Grade 3A.

We are not aware of any constraints to the site which would prevent development such as restrictive covenants, public rights of way, flood risk, physical constraints including topography or trees or contamination affecting the site. The site is therefore available immediately.

Add any documents supporting your submission

Call for Sites Moor Lane Pattingham LR.pdf

Site ID #73

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Land at Bridge Farm, Brinsford Lane, Coven Heath

Site Address

Bridge Farm, Brinsford Lane, Coven Heath,

Site Postcode

WV10 7PR

Site Area in Hectares

1.4

Site Area in Hectares of land suitable for development, if different to above

Not Provided.

Please provide a brief summary of the current use(s) of this site or last known lawful use(s)

Class B8 - storage of HGVs

What use or mix of uses do you propose for this site? Please tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

If housing or employment is proposed, please specify how many homes or how many hectares of employment land you think could be accommodated on the site.

Application for mobile static caravan - refused (13/01017/FUL); application for change of use for the storage of caravans including reception office - refused (01/00235/COU); and application for renewal of narrow boat workshop - refused (00/00576/VAR)

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

Option agreement Green Homes Telford Ltd

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Not Provided.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Rectangular in site this is a brownfield underutilised site located in the Green Belt. There are two substantial double height storey sheds; a large bungalow; and the remainder of the site is covered in hardstanding.

The site is bounded to the north by the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal; to the east by a mature hedge and the Wolverhampton Casuals Football Club; to the south by Brinsford Lane; and the west by the A449. The site is approximately 0.6miles from Junction 2 of the M54 and is located within the triangle to the three Strategic Employment Sites in South Staffordshire namely i54; Hilton Cross; and the Royal Ordnance Factory (ROF) at Featherstone.

The site is approximately 1.3 miles away from the shops on Brewood Road in Coven, and 2 miles from the shops on The Avenue in Featherstone.

The site is presently used as a storage facility for HGVs, but the operator is retiring. As part of the evidence gathering exercise for the South Staffordshire Site Allocations Document, (SAD), the Employment Land Study identifies that there is an oversupply of 12.3 ha of employment land to meet South Staffordshire’s local employment need. However, in light of the findings of the Black Country and South Staffordshire Sub Regional High Quality Employment Land Study 2014/15, and whilst it is not for South Staffordshire to meet the Black County employment land shortfall, the Council has sought to allocate modest extensions to the designated Strategic Employment Sites in the SAD to help to meet these wider regional needs. The loss of this existing use (Class B8) is therefore not considered an obstacle is respect of considering alternative uses for this brownfield site.

Add any documents supporting your submission

Call for site form Bridge Farm site plan.pdf

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

No. The site has no real abnormal development costs which would require external funding.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

We attach for your information a site location plan. The site is located on the Penn Road in Upper Penn. The site is highly sustainable being on a main bus route into Wolverhampton and being within walking distance of a comprehensive range of facilities including pubs, nursery, shops, doctor’s surgery and dentists.

The site is well hidden from most views with a strong belt of trees surrounding the site to the north, west and south. The site in not in a Conservation Area nor within any designated ecology or habitat area. However, the site is adjacent to Penn Hall School which is a Grade II Listed Building.

However, there is a substantial tree buffer between the subject site and the listed building which sits within its own grounds. This in addition to the sites topography would result in minimal effect on the setting on the Listed Building given its current use and the amount of new buildings that have been constructed within the grounds of Penn Hall.

The site is within the greenbelt however, we would argue that there is no real purpose for the inclusion of this site within the greenbelt as it is unclear what the reasons are for protecting the land from development. The land in fact, lends itself more to the suburban nature of Upper Penn and with development on all sides of the site including the cemetery to the west.

The release of this site from the greenbelt would result in minimal harm to the surrounding area and would not contribute towards the coalescence or joining of any surrounding villages. In addition, Vicarage Road acts as the natural boundary between the suburban built form of Penn and the countryside to the south, and its release for development would have limited visual and landscape impact.

The site is immediately deliverable for housing and there are no technical issues which would adversely affect the viability of the site.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #75

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

If yes, please provide details.

Time expired South Staffordshire planning permission 95/00455. Planning permission was granted for residential development on part of the application site. Please see attached representation to South Staffordshire Council Site Allocation’s Local Plan.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

The site is controlled by an experienced land promoter and has been acquired in the knowledge of strong market interest in delivering residential development in this location. IM Land are of the view that if the site is allocated for development the delivery of residential development on site will be prompt and sales rate will be strong.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

At the present time no viability constraints are expected.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

The site has been promoted for development through the South Staffordshire Local Plan review. Please find attached the representations submitted to the South Staffordshire Site Allocations Plan in February 2017.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is in a suitable and sustainable location for development. It is capable of providing a relatively significant amount of development to meet the growth requirements of the Black Country authorities (and South Staffordshire). It has good access to a range of services and facilities given its close proximity to Huntington Town Centre and the relationship between Huntington and Cannock. The site can start to deliver development promptly assisting in meeting the significant Black Country housing shortfall in the short term.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #76

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

As part of any proposal a large part of the site would be made available for open space/ nature area with public footpaths/access.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

I understand that there were some informal discussion with Mark Elliot, Planning Officer at Wolverhampton City Council.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site has existing housing development on either side of it and any proposal would incorporate using the undeveloped area of the site as public open space / nature reserve and allow for public footpath / assess. This will improve wider connectivity and improve the biodiversity value of the site.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #93

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Could be made available within 15 years if allocated for residential development.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

Not Provided.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Not Provided.

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Unlikely.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Please refer to letter of representation in response to Black Country Core Strategy Review and the comments made in this letter in support of the ‘Call for Sites’ application.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Any requirement for new facilities shall depend on the scale of the development and evidence of infrastructure needs in the local and wider areas.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Please provide supporting details for the above.

The proposed residential development will incorporate ancillary infrastructure including footpaths and (if necessary) cycleways. Moreover, an attenuation pond and public open space will form integral parts of the scheme

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Please provide supporting details for each constraint identified above.

The site is a former industrial site and contains disused mineshafts, underground workings and filled land. Ground investigation work is currently in progress.

There is interest from PLC housebuilders.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Unknown - to be determined by the developer and the results of the current investigations.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

In June 2017 we agreed with the council (Alison Ives, Principle Planning Officer) that updated technical reports would be submitted in order ro progress the undetermined planning application for the site. The work is underway.

Add any documents supporting your submission

Former Caparo Works Location Plan.pdf

GALLAGHER ESTATES CONTROL THE SITE AND WILL CO-ORDINATE ALL ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

A DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT HAS BEEN SENT TO WALSALL BOROUGH COUNCIL. WE HAVE ALSO MET WITH ANDY JOHNSON, KELLY HARRIS, KAREN RICHARDS AND ED HARRIS FROM SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL ON 27TH JANUARY 2017 TO DISCUSS THE SITE.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL WERE RECEPTIVE OF THE INITIAL PROPOSALS

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

N/A

What new infrastructure do you think will be required to support the development of the site?

Not Provided.

Please provide supporting details for the above.

New site entrance junction – either separate or combined

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Unkown

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is adjacent to the existing settlement of Hardwick and would be a logical extension to the settlement. It is also within 2 km to Aldridge town centre and 640 meters to Hardwick District Centre.

Add any documents supporting your submission

Land east and west of Chester Road Location Plan.pdf

Site ID #108

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

The land and building are controlled by a developer.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

The site is being promoted by a housebuilder and will be developed when planning permission is secured.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

The site is a greenfield site and as such we are not aware of any constraints to development at this stage.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Yes – submissions have been made previously in respect of the site to the Bromsgrove District Council Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site represents a logical extension to existing housing development in Hagley. Hagley is highly sustainable settlement, with existing primary and secondary schools, along with a train station, that is well related to the Black Country and, therefore, well placed to receive a proportion of the current housing requirement in the BCCS.

The following questions ask what you think the site could potentially be used for, what services are available and any related constraints on the site.

Add any documents supporting your submission

Western Road, A491 Stourbridge Road, Hagley Site Plan.pdf

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

The site is a greenfield site and as such we are not aware of any constraints to development at this stage.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Yes – submissions have been made previously in respect of the site to the Bromsgrove District Council Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Add any documents supporting your submission

Stoney Lane, Stakenbridge, Hagley Site Plan.pdf

There are no major infrastructure requirements associated with the site’s development.
Where improvements are required to say local schools, appropriate financial contributions can
be provided.

The site currently lies within the Green Belt, but a logical and defensible Green Belt boundary can be secured by following the north western boundary of the site along Holbeache Lane. The site is already contained by and sits opposite existing housing on Wolverhampton Road and sits immediately adjoining existing housing to the south east. The site has direct access to Wolverhampton Road, with provision of a new arm of the existing roundabout. New local equipped
play facilities could support the development of the site, existing trees to site boundaries retained and a sustainable development of high quality new housing provided which would positively contribute to the area and meet housing needs.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

There are no major infrastructure requirements associated with the site’s development.
Where improvements are required to say local schools, appropriate financial contributions
can be provided.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If there is a current use of the site that needs to be relocated what arrangements are required to achieve this relocation? e.g. manufacturer currently on the site needs to move to a building of xx square meters with good access to the motorway.

Existing occupation is the business operated by the current land owner.

What new infrastructure do you think will be required to support the development of the site?

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

See accompanying letter in support of Call for Sites submission

Add any documents supporting your submission

Land at 30 Gorge Road, Sedgley, Dudley, DY3 1LA.pdf

Numerous enquiries from national housebuilders and promoters

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Meeting with head of planning and strategic planning colleagues at Dudley MBC

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Please see representations report (submitted 8 September 2017)

Add any documents supporting your submission

Site ID #115

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Site

Land off Birmingham Road, Great Barr

Site Address

Land off Birmingham Road, Great Barr

Site Postcode

Not Provided.

Site Area in Hectares

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

The landowner has been approached by both housebuilders and industrial developers regarding the availability of the site.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

The site is being comprehensively promoted by IM Land to demonstrate its delivery in the short-medium term. A Vision Document, backed up by detailed evidence accompanies IM Land’s ‘Issues and Options’ submission, showing that there are no technical constraints that would prevent a scheme of approximately 1,500 units coming forward.

Add any documents supporting your submission

Site ID #118

No - The site is achievable and could be bought forward for development within the first five years of the new Core Strategy plan period, given there are no known legal or technical impediments that would preclude the development of the site.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

GVA contacted Mike Smith, Planning Policy Manager at Walsall Council, in August 2017 and requested a
meeting to discuss the site with relevant planning officers. A meeting is due to be set up for October 2017.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The full details of the site and the opportunity provided by it are presented within the Development Statement
(which contains an Illustrative Masterplan) that has been submitted alongside Taylor Wimpey UK Limited’s
representations to the Black Country Core Strategy Review Issues and Options consultation (GVA, September
2017). Please refer to the Development Statement for further information.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #119

What new infrastructure do you think will be required to support the development of the site?

Not Provided.

Please provide supporting details for the above.

The infrastructure required will be typical of an open market residential development on a greenfield site. There will be the requirement for internal access road and pavements. We do not consider there will be the requirement for any infrastructure that would be considered abnormal.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

Not Provided.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

No it is not envisaged that there will be viability issues that will require the use of external funding.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Representation has previously been submitted to both Wolverhampton Council and South Staffordshire Council regarding the site. Please see information previously submitted attached to this form.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is located within a sustainable location on the edge of Wolverhampton and has the capacity to accommodate approximately 120 dwellings with sufficient areas of private amenity space and a large are of public open space to be enjoyed by the community. The density of the scheme has been proposed at 15 dph taking into consideration the density of the dwellings surrounding the site and the built development characteristics of the area. However, there is the opportunity for the density of the scheme to be increased to support more dwellings. Affordable would be provided in accordance with local planning guidance and the scheme will include 2,3,4 and 5 bedroom dwellings.

The proposed development will take access from Bridgnorth Road. From this access point, a series of internal avenues will provide access to the interlinking areas of residential development. There will be a main primary road which runs through the site. This will circle the area of open space which will be the Village Green in the centre of the development. The secondary roads throughout the site will incorporate private drives and cul-de-sacs. The site will also have new footpaths to provide links throughout the site and linking the new housing to the wider area and the wealth of services and facilities provided for in the local area.
The site is highly sustainable and accessible with excellent links to services and facilities. Located within 3 miles of Wolverhampton City Centre and within 2 miles of the local centres of Tettenhall; Tettenhall Wood; Compton; Finchfield, Castlecroft, Merryhill all situated within Wolverhampton. The South Staffordshire settlements of Perton and Pattingham are within 3 miles of the site. There are 13 educational institutes within easy access of the site including primary; secondary; higher education; and special needs schools and the site is accessible to employment opportunities in South Staffordshire, Wolverhampton, the Black Country and Birmingham.
The site is within close proximity to facilities such as elderly care facilities; medical care (doctors, dentist and opticians); churches; public houses and restaurants and recreation and sports facilities in addition to the aforementioned facilities within a 3 mile radius. The site benefits from high quality transport links. The Bridgnorth Road (A454) provides access to both Bridgnorth and to Wolverhampton City Centre. The Arriva number 9 Telford to Wolverhampton via, Ironbridge and Bridgnorth bus service travels along Bridgnorth Road and is an hourly service. There is a bus stop 300m from the site. Wolverhampton Train station is within 4 miles of the site providing a direct train service to Telford in 17minutes; Stafford in 12 minutes and Birmingham within 17 minutes. Direct services to both Manchester and London can be achieve in 1 hour 10 minutes and 1hour 48 minutes respectively. Further, the site is within easy access to other A roads such as the A41 and A449 within 3.5 miles of the site and the Motorway network is easily accessible with both the M54 and M6 within 7 miles.
Please see attached previous representation submitted and redline boundary plan.

Add any documents supporting your submission

Site ID #120

Please provide supporting details for the above.

We do not consider any of the above would be required to support the development of the site. The site is highly sustainable. On site as part of the development, an access road will be required. We envisage a single access that will lead to all the properties.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Yes

If yes, please provide details.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

Not Provided.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

No it is not envisaged that there will be viability issues that will require the use of external funding.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Yes, pre-application advice has been requested from Walsall Council.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is located within the urban area of Darlaston, Walsall with excellent sustainability.
The site is located within a mile of Darlaston town centre with an array of shops including Asda and Boots. The site is also with 1 mile of the regions only Ikea store and of Gallagher Retail Park which has shops such as B&Q, Currys PC World, TK Maxx, Burger King, Next, Decathlon and other clothes and household goods related stores.
The site has excellent accessibility with junctions 9 and 10 of the M6 motorway being within 1 and 1.7 miles respectively of the site. The Black Country Route is within 1.3 miles of the site providing access to Walsall town centre and Wolverhampton and Dudley.
The site is located within close proximity of a number of schools catering for both primary and secondary education. Medical facilities such as Darlaston Medical Centre and Bhadal Dental Surgery and both within 0.6miles from the site.
Public transport is available for eventual users of the site. There are two bus stops located within 100 both to the east and west of the site on Walsall Road. Bus service 34, 37, 39 and 334 providing frequent bus services to Walsall town centre, Darlaston town centre, Bilston and Willenhall
The site is adjacent to a Texaco petrol station which also sells a range of convenience goods.
Development will comprise of approximately 5 dwellings with a single access point. The dwellings will be 2 and 3 bedroom properties and will be designed in keeping with surrounding properties.
We consider the site is highly sustainable as indicated above and development of this site would result in much needed housing within an urban location.
The site is indicated by means of a redline boundary on the attached plan.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #121

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Internally on the site, we anticipate there will be the requirement for new roads and footpaths.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

No it is not envisaged that there will be viability issues that will require the use of external funding.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is located north east of Codsall Road on the edge of Wolverhampton adjacent to Palmers Cross. The site is identified by means of a redline boundary on the attached plan.
The site is approximately 4.5 hectares however there is potential for an additional 9.7ha adjacent land to be included.
The site is located within a sustainable location. The site is located adjacent to the urban residential area of Wolverhampton with easy access to facilities and services available in the Wolverhampton areas of Palmers Cross, Aldersley and Penderford and Codsall which is located within South Staffordshire district.
Within 1 mile of the site there are at least 7 schools catering for primary and secondary education (up to age 18).
There are other services such as doctors, dentists, opticians, public houses, places of worship, petrol stations and convenience good shops including several large supermarkets.
The site is accessible with excellent transport links within close proximity. The site is 0.8 mile from Bilbrook train station from here trains to Wolverhampton city centre, Telford and Birmingham are available. All three destinations can be reached within 30 minutes. Within 300 metres both to the north and south of the site along Codsall Road there are bus stops providing access to frequent bus services to Codsall village centre and Wolverhampton City Centre. (Bus service 5 and 5A). The A41 and A449 are both within 2 miles of the site providing access to the motorway network.
The excellent transport links facilitate the easy access to employment opportunities near the site.
We consider the development will accommodate approximately 120 dwellings (with the opportunity for an additional circa 230 dwellings on adjacent land) that would consist of 2, 3, 4, and 5 bedroom dwellings. The scheme would include affordable housing in accordance with local policy. There is the potential for the development to include a range of house types to cater to all members of society.
Areas of open space will be important part of the scheme to ensure separation of Wolverhampton and Bilbrook/Codsall with the opportunity to provide a country park between the two settlements.
The development would be designed to take into consideration the character of the surrounding area.
We are unaware of any constraints that would prevent residential development on the site.

Add any documents supporting your submission

land north east side of Codsall Road.pdf

Site ID #122

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Land north of Bognop Road, Essington

Site Address

Bognop Road, Essington, South Staffordshire

Site Postcode

Not Provided.

Site Area in Hectares

23.34

Not Provided.

Please provide supporting details for the above.

Internal access arrangements will be required including roads and pavements but this will form part of the scheme as a whole on site. It is likely that there would be an area of open space on site as part of the landscaping scheme. We do not consider there will be the requirement for any infrastructure changes off site.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

In most recent years, planning permission was refused in 2011 for the use of part of the site for HGV trailer parking with ancillary site security office and landscaping. Prior to this, the planning history for the site is as follows:
1978 - Sand and gravel working and processing at Windmill Quarry (Ref: SS/404/74) Granted subject to conditions.
1988 – Extension to sand and gravel working at Windmill Quarry (Ref: SS.436/86) Granted subject to conditions.
1991 – Erection of screening plant, conveyors and storage of aggregates at Windmill Quarry Granted subject to conditions.
1991 - Extension of the existing Tarmac block works into Windmill Quarry to create ash processing site. The site area was 1.6 hectares (4 acres) (Ref No SS204/91). Granted subject to conditions.
1998 – Extension of existing mineral workings together with the variation of condition 26 of planning permission SS/404/74 to facilitate the removal of trees from the Mill Ride area at Windmill Quarry. Granted subject to conditions.
2001 - Extension to the existing ash processing operation and the provision of a concrete recycling facility. The site area was an additional 1.0 hectare (2.47 acres). ( Ref No SS/01/0661). Granted subject to conditions.
2002 – Variation of conditions 3 and 4 of planning permission SS.01/00661. Granted subject to conditions.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

The site is being marketed by First City Limited for development.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

No it is not envisaged that there will be viability issues that will require the use of external funding.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Previously representation has been submitted to South Staffordshire Council in connection to allocating the site for employment related uses.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

We consider the site would be ideal for employment related development. The site is 23 hectares (57.7 acres) and is located within a sustainable location. The site is identified by means of a redline boundary on the attached plan.
The site is located at Junction 1 of the M54 motorway on the edge of Westcroft, Wolverhampton. The site is in close proximity to the M6 also providing excellent transport links and connectivity.
The site is bordered by Hilton Main Industrial Estate to the west and within close proximity of Hilton Cross Business Park, the I54 is within 2 miles of the site. This site would make an obvious and ideal extension providing 23 hectares of additional employment land in an area which is in high demand. The site lies within the M54 Technology corridor.
The site would well serve the needs of both Wolverhampton and the wider Black Country and South Staffordshire in a positive cross boundary development.
The site is sustainable with access to services and facilities in surrounding areas of Featherstone, Essington, Fordhouses, Bushbury and Westcroft.
We consider the site could be used for B1, B2 and B8 uses and is in an area which would not result in any negative impacts on any surrounding land uses.
We envisage the development would be built within 5 years and could range from brick built office buildings to industrial units built at various sizes immediately available to rent, there would also be an option for some units to be ‘design and build’, built to meet the specific needs of the occupier.
As part of the development landscaping would be an important element with planting throughout the site, where appropriate to ensure an attractive development is achieved.

Add any documents supporting your submission

Land north of Bognop Road Essington site plan.pdf

Site ID #123

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

There will be the requirement for internal roads and footpaths as part of the development, however no major infrastructure.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

No it is not envisaged that there will be viability issues that will require the use of external funding.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is located north of Blackhalve Lane and to the east of Wood Hayes Road in Wednesfield, Wolverhampton. The site is identified by means of a redline boundary on the attached plan.
The site is approximately 4.9 hectares and triangular in shape. The site straddles the boundary of Wolverhampton and South Staffordshire District and therefore located within both administrative areas.
The site is located within a sustainable location. The site is located adjacent to the urban residential area of Wolverhampton with easy access to facilities and services available in the Wolverhampton areas of Wednesfield, Bushbury and Ashmore Park. The South Staffordshire district villages of Essington and Featherstone are within 1.5 miles of the site.
Within 1 mile of the site there are approximately 18 schools catering for nursery primary and secondary education (up to age 18).
There are other services within one mile of the site such as doctors, dentists, opticians, public houses, places of worship, petrol stations and convenience good shops.
The site is accessible with excellent transport links within close proximity. Bus stops ae located to the North West and south west of the site providing access to frequent bus services to Wolverhampton City Centre and Cannock town centre via Cheslyn Hay and Featherstone. (Bus service 70 and 70E). The A460 is within 300 metres of the site providing access to the motorway network (junction 1 of the M54 is 1.5 miles of the site.
The excellent transport links facilitate easy access to employment opportunities near the site. Hilton Main Industrial Estate and Hilton Cross Business Park are within 1.2 miles of the site and the I54 at junction 2 of the M54 is within 3 miles from the site.
We consider the development will accommodate approximately 140 dwellings that would consist of 2, 3, 4, and 5 bedroom dwellings. The scheme would include affordable housing in accordance with local policy. There is the potential for the development to include a range of house types to cater to all members of society.
Areas of public open space and soft landscaping will feature as part of the development scheme. Areas of open space will be an important part of the scheme.
The development would be designed to take into consideration the character of the surrounding area.
We are unaware of any constraints that would prevent residential development on the site.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

None

Site ID #125

Please provide supporting details for the above.

Refer to RPS covering letter.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

Barratt Developments have secured an interest in the site with the landowner.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

Not Provided.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Housing is likely to be the only viable form of redevelopment of this site without public funding

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Pre-application discussions with Walsall Council, Case Officer Barbara Toy

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Please see accompanying Representation.

Add any documents supporting your submission

2178_IssuesOptions_FINAL_080917_Redacted.pdf

Site ID #128

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Unknown at this stage.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #129

Unknown at this stage, but unlikely given the sites green field nature.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #130

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Land at Heathfield Lane West, Darlaston

Site Address

Land (including Factory Complex AP (UK) at Heathfield Lane West,, Darlaston

Site Postcode

Not Provided.

Site Area in Hectares

7.4

Site Area in Hectares of land suitable for development, if different to above

Please provide a brief summary of the current use(s) of this site or last known lawful use(s)

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

There may be a need to seek the use of external funding to assist with ensuring that development proposals on the site are viable (subject to details of the development proposals and S106 requirements).

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Initial pre-application advice was obtained from Walsall Council on 06/08/2015 and pre-application discussions continue to take place.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is currently included within the 2016 Walsall SHLAA and is the subject of a proposed site allocation within the emerging Walsall Site Allocations Document (ref HO303).

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Please refer to Indicative Development Framework Plan, which includes a Primary School (if necessary), a local centre and open space.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

MARKET ENQUIRIES RECEIVED AND UNDER REVIEW AT PRESENT

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

NOT ANTICIPATED AT THIS TIME

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

SEE RESOLUTION TO GRANT – 17/1362/FL/W2

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

DISCUSSIONS ARE ONGOING WITH WALSALL COUNCIL TO PROGRESS APPLICATION 17/1362/FL/W2

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

YES, GRANT APPLICATION MADE

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

PRE‐APPLICATION SUBMISSION – SCREENING WITH WALSALL MBC

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

If there is a current use of the site that needs to be relocated what arrangements are required to achieve this relocation? e.g. manufacturer currently on the site needs to move to a building of xx square meters with good access to the motorway.

What new infrastructure do you think will be required to support the development of the site?

Not Provided.

Please provide supporting details for the above.

Site ID #136

Please provide supporting details for the above.

Not Provided.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

EXISTING PART ALLOCATION

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

CONFIDENTIAL ENQUIRIES RECEIVED

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

S.A.D. SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE ALLOCATION PROCESS UNDERWAY

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

There is no new infrastructure required to support the delivery of a modest number of homes in this location.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Please see covering letter.

Add any documents supporting your submission

1673_080917_Redacted.pdf

Site ID #138

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Land north of Linthouse Lane

Site Address

Land North of Linthouse Lane, south of the Dismantled Railway Line, west of Kitchen Lane and east of Wood End Road/
Cannock Road (Please see attached location plan)

Site Postcode

WV11 3TL

Site Area in Hectares

148

Please see accompanying Development Statement

If there is a current use of the site that needs to be relocated what arrangements are required to achieve this relocation? e.g. manufacturer currently on the site needs to move to a building of xx square meters with good access to the motorway.

What new infrastructure do you think will be required to support the development of the site?

Not Provided.

Please provide supporting details for the above.

Please see accompanying Development Statement

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

Please see accompanying Development Statement

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Please see accompanying Development Statement

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

Please see accompanying Development Statement

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Please provide supporting details for each constraint identified above.

Is the site agricultural land? If so, then what is the agricultural landclassification? Please provide survey results, including mapping.

None

Site ID #141

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Site

Lodge Lane, Swindon Road, Kidderminster Road, Kingswinford, Dudley

Site Address

Lodge Lane, Swindon Road, Kidderminster Road, Kingswinford, Dudley

Site Postcode

Not Provided.

Site Area in Hectares

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

The site is controlled by an experience land promoter who has been promoting the site for the last three years. The promoters have received interest from a national housebuilder who is acquiring and developing the site.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #143

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #144

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Please refre to indicative development framework plan, which includes a primary school (if necessary), a local centre and open space.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Grade 4 Poor (see enclosed Map)

Not all the site needs to be dveloped, only the upper slopes to fit in with existing development pattern.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #148

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Land at King Hays Farm

Site Address

Off Walsall Wood Road

Site Postcode

Not Provided.

Site Area in Hectares

8.5

Site Area in Hectares of land suitable for development, if different to above

Please provide a brief summary of the current use(s) of this site or last known lawful use(s)

Onlly in part. Poor quality land. Mainly pasture. No surveys to date

Land needs comprehensive approach funded by enabling residential development

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #149

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council own the site and St Modwen Developments Ltd have a
Development Agreement with them to bring the site forward for development so discussions are
ongoing on a regular basis. The Council have approved various applications on the site over recent
years.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

This is a longstanding vacant site within a prominent, highly accessible location. The planning
history of the site demonstrates that principle of the development of the site for a variety of uses
including centre type uses. The site lends itself to a high quality development that would help to
generate employment opportunities and attract investment.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

There is potential opportunity to provide for enhancements to local access to the site and this
may require some additional infrastructure to support it, e.g. car parking or visitors’ facilities

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Viability is being assessed.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Outline planning application is currently under consideration by Wolverhampton City Council (ref.
17/00671/OUT). Discussions ongoing.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Development of this brownfield site would significantly improve the local environment by removing
highly obtrusive factory buildings. The site does not possess the characteristics of a High Quality
Employment site and should be considered for residential development. It would positively
contribute to the supply of, and ongoing need for, housing within the City. The site has good access
to a range of local facilities and employment opportunities and is well served by public transport.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #152

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Land at Yorks Bridge

Site Address

Land at Yorks Bridge, Lichfield Road, Pelsall, Walsall

Site Postcode

Not Provided.

Site Area in Hectares

None

Site ID #153

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #154

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

Allocated housing site - Policy HOC8 Sandwell Site Allocations and Delivery DPD

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

tbc

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #155

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #156

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #157

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Ray Hall Lane

Site Address

Ray Hall Lane

Site Postcode

B43 6JE

Site Area in Hectares

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #158

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

If yes, please provide details.

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

tbc

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #159

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Walsall Wood

Site Address

Green Lane

Site Postcode

WS9 9BE

Site Area in Hectares

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #160

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Willenhall

Site Address

Walsall Road

Site Postcode

WS2 0DH

Site Area in Hectares

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

99.23

Not Provided.

Please provide supporting details for the above.

See concept masterplan accompanying this Call for Sites submission.

Are there any existing or historic planning permissions on the site? If yes please include any details e.g. application reference number.

It is assumed that based on the scale of development, there is sufficient capacity within the local area regarding other social and physical infrastructure or would otherwise be improved via financial contributions. There however remains scope to consider other uses on-site.

The site is available, suitable, deliverable and viable. There are no known constraints other than its location within the Green Belt. Otherwise it is in a very sustainable location, well related to the urban edge of Aldridge and can form a logical rounding off to the settlement and provide a new defensible boundary to the Green Belt, with minimal harm to the Green Belt purposes.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #163

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Not Provided.

Site Address

Skip Lane Walsall

Site Postcode

WS5 3NB

Site Area in Hectares

2.347

Site Area in Hectares of land suitable for development, if different to above

2.347

Please provide a brief summary of the current use(s) of this site or last known lawful use(s)

Grazing

What use or mix of uses do you propose for this site? Please tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

If housing or employment is proposed, please specify how many homes or how many hectares of employment land you think could be accommodated on the site.

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #164

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Yes

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Yes

Site

Not Provided.

Site Address

Skip Lane

Site Postcode

WS5 3NB

Site Area in Hectares

5.847

Site Area in Hectares of land suitable for development, if different to above

3.5

Please provide a brief summary of the current use(s) of this site or last known lawful use(s)

Grazing

What use or mix of uses do you propose for this site? Please tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

If housing or employment is proposed, please specify how many homes or how many hectares of employment land you think could be accommodated on the site.

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #165

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

If yes, please provide details.

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

If yes, please provide details.

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

Site ID #168

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Don't know

The site is being promoted by IM Land, an experienced site promoter, alongside the owners of the golf club. IM Land have identified that there is strong market interest in bringing the site forward for residential development should the site be allocated for a residential scheme in tyhe emrging plan.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The site is in highly sustainable location for development. The land between the club and the built up edge of Perton has been identified as a preferred location for residentialdevelopment by the emerging South Staffordshire Sites Allocations Plan. The site does, therefore, form a logical location for additional development next to the settlement edge.
The development of the site will not adversely impact on the setting and special character of a historical town. The development of the site will not adversely affect urban regeneration. It is recognised by the emerging plan that there are insufficient brownfield sites available to meet the growth requirements of the Black Country, and it is now acknowledged that Green Belt release will be required. The site has strong and defensible Green Belt boundaries and is surrounded by mature vegetation on all sides.
Whilst it will result in encroachment into the Green Belt this is true of any development in the Green Belt. The site is well suited for release from the Green Belt when considered against the guidance in the Framework.
The site will not result in towns merging into one another. It is located on the western edge of Perton with no nearby settlements that will be impacted upon by the development.
The site's close proximity to Perton means that it cahn take advantage of the existing services and facilities available in the wider area. The developemnt is also of a scale that it will help create further footfall in Perton Town Centre improving its viability and vitality.
Furthermore if glof membership continues to decline, an alternative use must be clearly identified for the site. It cannot be simply left vacant. A residential led scheme is the most suitable alternative use for the site.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #169

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #170

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Not Provided.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

Not Provided.

Add any documents supporting your submission

None

Site ID #171

What is your / your clients interest in this site? If you are an agent please answer on behalf of your client only. Please select all that apply.

Not Provided.

Does the other owner(s) support your proposals for the site?

Is there direct vehicle access to the site i.e. from a public road?

Site

The Traingle, Lodge Lane/Swindon Road, Kingswinford

Site Address

Lodge Lane/Swindon Road/Kiddermisnter Road, Kingswinford, Dudley

Site Postcode

Not Provided.

Site Area in Hectares

Not Provided.

Is the land available immediately for development (subject to obtaining any necessary planning permissions)?

Yes

If no, please explain why not and give an estimated timescale for when it will become available.

Not Provided.

Is there any current market interest in the site, other than from you / your client? Tick all that apply.

Not Provided.

Please provide further details of the market interest in this site.

The site is controlled by an experince land promoter who has been promoting the site for the last three years. The promoters have received interest from a national housebuilder who is acquiring and developing the site.

Once started how many years do you think it would take to develop the site?

Do you think it is likely that there will be viability issues with developing the site that will require the use of external funding?

Not Provided.

Have you previously contacted a Black Country or neighbouring authority about this site?

Yes

If yes, please provide brief details e.g. who you contacted and when and the current position of discussions.

Discussions have been held on several occasions with Martin dando in order to explain the availability and suitability of the site for allocation in the revised BCCS. There concerned in March 2014. The site was promoted through the Dudley Borough Development Startegy conubarbation on the basis that it would be released if Green Belt sites were required.

Please provide any additional comments you may have that are relevant to the site you are putting forward.

The Representator has carried out an intial assessment of the suitability of the site for development. The assesssment by Messrs Atkins is attached for refernce.