Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Search representations
Results for SBP Property Ventures Ltd search
New searchObject
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 50a - Do you think that the Core Strategy should continue to set a target for the total employment land stock in Policy EMP1? Yes/No; Please explain why.
Representation ID: 573
Received: 08/09/2017
Respondent: SBP Property Ventures Ltd
Agent: Harris Lamb
We believe that Policy EMP1 should provide a net employment land target in order to allow for losses to alternative uses to be taken into account.
We believe that Policy EMP1 should provide a net employment land target in order to allow for losses to alternative uses to be taken into account.
Object
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 95a - Do you think Garden City principles should be applied in the Black Country? Yes/No; If yes, how should they be applied?
Representation ID: 574
Received: 08/09/2017
Respondent: SBP Property Ventures Ltd
Agent: Harris Lamb
We would not encourage this as a design approach in the Black Country. Garden City proposals were developed expressly for new settlements. The Black Country has a different history and heritage as do the settlements that are geographically and functionally close to the Black Country. We do not consider the vernacular of the existing urban area and adjoining settlements appropriate for Garden City principles.
We would not encourage this as a design approach in the Black Country. Garden City proposals were developed expressly for new settlements. The Black Country has a different history and heritage as do the settlements that are geographically and functionally close to the Black Country. We do not consider the vernacular of the existing urban area and adjoining settlements appropriate for Garden City principles.
Object
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 98 - Do you support the proposed changes relating to Design Quality? Yes/No; If you think that any other changes should be made to Policy ENV3 please provide details.
Representation ID: 575
Received: 08/09/2017
Respondent: SBP Property Ventures Ltd
Agent: Harris Lamb
The introduction of the Nationally Described Space Standard has implications for viability since it introduces a significant additional cost to new house building without necessarily any uplift in values. It can, therefore, reduce the ability of schemes to provide other planning obligations. We, therefore, suggest it is removed.
The introduction of the Nationally Described Space Standard has implications for viability since it introduces a significant additional cost to new house building without necessarily any uplift in values. It can, therefore, reduce the ability of schemes to provide other planning obligations. We, therefore, suggest it is removed.
Object
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 99c - Do you think that national space standards for housing development should be introduced in the Black Country? Yes/No; If yes, please specify what level and percentage would be appropria
Representation ID: 576
Received: 08/09/2017
Respondent: SBP Property Ventures Ltd
Agent: Harris Lamb
In the context of our response to Question 98, we do not agree that National Space Standard should be introduced.
In the context of our response to Question 98, we do not agree that National Space Standard should be introduced.
Object
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 101a - Do you support the proposed changes relating to Flood Risk, Sustainable Drainage and Urban Heat Island effects? Yes/No; Further comments?
Representation ID: 577
Received: 08/09/2017
Respondent: SBP Property Ventures Ltd
Agent: Harris Lamb
Whilst we appreciate the need to have regard to new standards regarding SuDS provision, the implications on site layout and viability do need to be considered. A flexible approach is required from the Local Authorities in assessing individual schemes taking into account matters such as viability and effects on density. In particular, a joint approach is needed by statutory undertakers to ensure that SuDS areas can be adopted if they are provided as part of wider open space areas.
Whilst we appreciate the need to have regard to new standards regarding SuDS provision, the implications on site layout and viability do need to be considered. A flexible approach is required from the Local Authorities in assessing individual schemes taking into account matters such as viability and effects on density. In particular, a joint approach is needed by statutory undertakers to ensure that SuDS areas can be adopted if they are provided as part of wider open space areas.
Comment
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 1 - Do you agree that the Core Strategy review should be a partial review, retaining and stretching the existing spatial strategy and updating existing policies? Yes/No; If not, what do you
Representation ID: 2800
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: SBP Property Ventures Ltd
Agent: Harris Lamb
see attachment
see attachment
Comment
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 2 - Do you think that the key evidence set out in Table 1 is sufficient to support the key stages of the Core Strategy review? Yes/No; If not, what further evidence is required and, if there
Representation ID: 2801
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: SBP Property Ventures Ltd
Agent: Harris Lamb
see attachment
see attachment
Comment
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 3 - Do you agree that the housing need identified for the Black Country over the period 2014-36 in the SHMA, and the anticipated amount of supply, are appropriate and in line with national gu
Representation ID: 2802
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: SBP Property Ventures Ltd
Agent: Harris Lamb
see attachment
see attachment
Comment
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 4 - Do you consider the employment land requirement identified for the Black Country up to 2036 in the EDNA is appropriate and in line with national guidance? Yes/No; If not, please explain w
Representation ID: 2803
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: SBP Property Ventures Ltd
Agent: Harris Lamb
see attachment
see attachment
Comment
Black Country Core Strategy Issue and Option Report
Question 5 - Do you agree with the proposed approach to the Black Country Green Belt Review? Yes/No; If not, what additional work do you think is necessary?
Representation ID: 2804
Received: 07/09/2017
Respondent: SBP Property Ventures Ltd
Agent: Harris Lamb
see attachment
see attachment
