Draft Black Country Plan
Search representations
Results for L&Q Estates search
New searchComment
Draft Black Country Plan
Challenges and Issues
Representation ID: 18103
Received: 11/10/2021
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Paragraph 3.2 - "It should also reflect on the need to provide a range of housing sites to provide a choice in housing provision."
Comment
Draft Black Country Plan
Policy CSP1 - Development Strategy
Representation ID: 18117
Received: 11/10/2021
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Paragraph 3.5 to 3.10 - Comments in relation to DtC and not explaining how housing shortfall will be met. More explanation on the need to provide a range of housing type and location of sites.
Comment
Draft Black Country Plan
Policy CSP2 – The Strategic Centres and Core Regeneration Areas
Representation ID: 18125
Received: 11/10/2021
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Paragraphs 3.11 to 3.13 - This policy should mention Neighbourhood Growth Areas and have equal importance with Strategic Centres and Core Regeneration Areas. A more balanced approach is needed in accordance with the vision and CSP1.
"the justification for the approach set out in CSP2, focusing growth solely in the Strategic Centres and Core Regeneration Areas" "The narrow focus set out in CSP2 also conflicts to an extent with paragraph 3.15 which acknowledges that Green Belt status should not be the sole criteria in assessing the suitability of a site’s ability to deliver sustainable development." "The justification to CSP2 actually highlights the failings of such a narrow
approach, in that it would only deliver housing on 'poor quality and underused land' which will not deliver a range of housing opportunity sites nor reflect the need to provide choice in both types of accommodation but also location."
Comment
Draft Black Country Plan
Policy CSP3 – Towns and Neighbourhood Areas and the green belt
Representation ID: 18130
Received: 11/10/2021
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Paragraph 3.14 to 3.17 - CSP3 should be given equal status with CSP2. It may not be practical to achieve strong and seamless links to regenerated areas in the Core Regeneration Areas and Strategic Centres. Sustainable advantages of new Neighbourhood Growth Areas and the ability of green belt release to provide choice in the housing market.
Comment
Draft Black Country Plan
Policy CSP4 - Achieving well-designed places
Representation ID: 18324
Received: 11/10/2021
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Paragraph 3.19 " references made in criterion 2 to the
use of carbon based products being minimised. It is not understood why the use of renewable timber, for instance, would need to be minimised in the interests of sustainability, energy efficiency and minimising the use of non renewable resources. In addition, referencing is made in criterion 5 to the urban environment being designed in a way to encourage people to act in a ‘civil and responsible manner’. Again, it is difficult to perceive how a development proposal will deliver these specific requirements on the ground."
Support
Draft Black Country Plan
Policy CSP4 - Achieving well-designed places
Representation ID: 18325
Received: 11/10/2021
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Paragraph 3.19 "the general themes identified in CSP4 are supported."
Support
Draft Black Country Plan
Policy CSP1 - Development Strategy
Representation ID: 18328
Received: 11/10/2021
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Paragraph 3.7 "L&Q Estates generally support the approach set out in Policy CSP1, in particular the approach to providing Neighbourhood Growth Areas is supported in that this will deliver the broader range of housing sites necessary to provide choice."
Comment
Draft Black Country Plan
Policy GB1 – The Black Country Green Belt
Representation ID: 18455
Received: 11/10/2021
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Paragraph 3.21 to 3.22 - The policy should reinforce existing boundaries. Compensatory measures can be included within strategic allocation WSA1
Object
Draft Black Country Plan
Delivery Constraints
Representation ID: 18456
Received: 11/10/2021
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Paragraph 4.1 - Brownfield first approach not supported, broader approach recommended. Considered to undermine the "key part of the BCP which is to maintain a steady supply of housing land"
Comment
Draft Black Country Plan
Delivery Constraints
Representation ID: 18457
Received: 11/10/2021
Respondent: L&Q Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Paragraph 4.2 - "In itself mineral extraction can have significant adverse impacts on the amenity of neighbouring
properties. As set out elsewhere in these representations it is important that the BCP pays regard to this factor."