Existing Black Country Core Strategy

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Object

Draft Black Country Plan

Representation ID: 11410

Received: 01/10/2021

Respondent: Mr David Shaw

Representation Summary:

The wording here does not state any of the negatives of the plan. It should clearly state that to achieve the plan then the Black Country will be sacrificing green belt and all the negatives associated with that.

Comment

Draft Black Country Plan

Representation ID: 11779

Received: 08/10/2021

Respondent: Mr Gary Lambert

Representation Summary:

1.24 covid has shown us all that we need our green spaces more than ever.

Object

Draft Black Country Plan

Representation ID: 11905

Received: 10/10/2021

Respondent: Land and horse owners

Representation Summary:

build on brown sites

Object

Draft Black Country Plan

Representation ID: 11920

Received: 10/10/2021

Respondent: Ms Julie Edwards

Representation Summary:

You have said it yourself in this statement about the abandonment of the inner city, no one using city centres so these are the areas that could be developed along with the abandoned factory sites which litter the area. Live work homes in the city centre.

Comment

Draft Black Country Plan

Representation ID: 11954

Received: 10/10/2021

Respondent: Sheeba Mir

Representation Summary:

I underst the eocomical expansion and the growth of transport route again what about the growth and the well being of these people living on top of each other as per my earlier point consider the value for green belt to those involved in such expansion and the long term impact on their health without preserving the land for the next generation.

Object

Draft Black Country Plan

Representation ID: 12007

Received: 10/10/2021

Respondent: Mrs Lydia Ellis

Representation Summary:

The Black Country strategy is historic and not relevant. People in Dudley especially Stourbridge and Halesowen have stronger links to Bham and Worcestershire - the Black Country context is irrelevant.