Growth Targets

Object

Representation ID: 11189

Received: 26/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Nick Taylor

I object to the developments at site numbers WAH236, WAH238 and WAH240.
I believe the greenbelt should not be used for this purpose.

Object

Representation ID: 11284

Received: 29/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Morag Howell

We moved back to walsall [redacted personal information]. The green space behind our houses are what makes it feel less like a town, more like beautiful country village life. Building more houses here will take away our "on the doorstep" family walks and will create more pollution. Please don't build here. More houses, more residents, more crime, more traffic in an already busy area. This area feels a safe and beautiful place to bring up our kids, please don't take that away

Object

Representation ID: 11388

Received: 30/09/2021

Respondent: Mr David Miller

There should be no need to build houses on any Green Belt. The population of Walsall is not infinite.

Object

Representation ID: 11511

Received: 05/10/2021

Respondent: Mrs Gemma Broadhurst

The land by vicarage road/coronation road in High Heath already floods the roads and local houses when there is heavy rain. The road is also very busy with traffic with queues causing pollution and more houses here will make both things far worse

Object

Representation ID: 11707

Received: 08/10/2021

Respondent: Ms Julie Lynch

As a community we need to preserve our green spaces for use by the community and wildlife. We regularly see herds of deer grazing and exercising on the proposed site near York’s Bridge Pelsall.
Additionally more houses means more traffic and the area around Lichfield road, norton road and lime lane is already congested, there have been 2 fatal car accidents in the last 5 years alone. Increased traffic means increased likelihood of more fatalities.
Also the environmental issues this would bring. Increased risk of flooding, increased pollution.

Object

Representation ID: 11844

Received: 09/10/2021

Respondent: Mr Richard Knight

This section does not clearly state the amount of housing to be built on Greenbelt land.

Object

Representation ID: 11968

Received: 10/10/2021

Respondent: Ms Anna Hassell

I strongly object to the area along Aldridge Road being used. The consultation process for this area is flawed and discriminatory.

Comment

Representation ID: 12053

Received: 10/10/2021

Respondent: Miss Emma Thompson

WAH230 = object: Site is SLINC and green belt
WAH231= object: Site is SLINC and green belt
WAH232= object: Site contains a SLINC and green belt
WAH236= object: Site contains a SLINC and green belt
WAH239 = object: important ecological corridor and green belt
WAH242, WAH243, WAH25, WAH251, WAH254, WAH25 = object: Potential Site of Importance (for nature conservation)
WAH244 = object: high ecological value, Potential Site of Importance (for nature conservation).
WAH248, WAH249 = object: high ecological value
WAH25 = object: semi-natural habitat

Object

Representation ID: 12233

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mrs Karen Johnson

The expansions planned and encroachment onto green belt land provides no benefit for existing residents. To build on green belt is detrimental to the physical and mental health of existing residents, removing the lungs of Walsall and replacing them with air pollution and biodiversity loss.

A large proportion of new homes are planned for Streetly which will overwhelm local infrastructure as well as losing the character of the area, merging it into an overall urban sprawl.

WAH234 - proposed building on this area threatens the wildlife corridor to Sutton Park.

Comment

Representation ID: 12237

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Ms Julia Bannister

Government targets do not reflect local assessments; government has not provided methodology or justification for their growth targets nor sufficiently explained how these respond to housing need//provide affordable or sustainable housing/address the housing need. MPs, WMCA and local councils have identified there is sufficient brownfield land available to be brought back into use to meet the region's housing need. Brownfield sites should be repurposed: reuse of this land supports regeneration and tackles dereliction. Equally it preserves Green Belt. A disproportionate loss of Green Belt is being proposed for Walsall which will have a significant detrimental impact on the borough.

Object

Representation ID: 13977

Received: 26/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Matthew Draper

Table 30 cited under "To which part of the document does your comment relate?"

Object

Representation ID: 13987

Received: 26/09/2021

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Draper

Table 30 cited under "To which part of the document does your comment relate?"

Object

Representation ID: 23123

Received: 27/09/2021

Respondent: Mr Ian Batchelor

Number of people: 20

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 43944

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mrs Yvonne Thorp

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 43946

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Miss Hayley Shutts

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 43948

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mrs Beta Mason

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 43950

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mr Daniel Batchelor

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 43952

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Miss Lucy Batchelor

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 43954

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mr & Mrs W Methley

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 43956

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Bilgimer

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 44742

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Henderson

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 44744

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Kempson

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 44746

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Collins

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 44748

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mr Myles Chattwood

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 44750

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Sarah Metcalf

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces

Object

Representation ID: 44752

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Machin

object against the "Walsall growth targets for housing and employment land allocations", specifically the North Aldridge and Walsall Wood green belt Land including the Lazy Hill Road, Chester Road and Stonnal area of Aldridge. The proposal to remove sites from the green belt listing further diminishes our green and pleasant land surrounding Aldridge. It seem criminal to take more green land from this area when brown belt can be used outside of a rural village known for its green spaces