A. Dudley

Support

Representation ID: 46169

Received: 11/09/2021

Respondent: Julie Dumphy

We support the Council’s continued protection of countryside at Lapal, Illey, Coombeswood, Uffmoor, Hayley Green, Lutley and Foxcote, following a formal review of the Green Belt.

Circa 1989 Dudley Council, following a previous Green Belt review, improved the Public Rights of Way network in these areas by working in collaboration with local volunteer groups. Following on from that the Council promoted enjoyment of this countryside by the public for informal recreation. They
supported the production of walk leaflets explaining the historic landscape and ecological significance of each area. The Council even contributed £20,000 towards The Woodland Trust purchasing Uffmoor Wood, despite this being just outside the Borough boundary and coming under Bromsgrove Council. In doing so they appreciated the important relationship between this ancient coppice woodland and neighbouring farmland, including Tack Farm which is the site of a former Anglo-Saxon mill (Notwic Mill).

This countryside, protected by Green Belt designation, is rich in history.
At Lapal and Illey are the remains of Halesowen Abbey which is a Scheduled Ancient
Monument of National Importance.
At Lutley we have a Conservation Area associated with the historic Lutley Mill and the green lane that links it to the mediaeval hamlet of Lutley which was once held by the Canons of Wolverhampton.
Foxcote, which forms the foreground se ng of the Iron Age Fort on Wychbury Hill, and historically is linked to it, is archaeologically rich with finds of flint arrow heads, flint scrapers, axes and other tools. It was the site of ancient hunting summer camps and, in part, this explains the wide scatter of historic ‘finds’.

The countryside hereby defined is important to people from far afield and, within the wider landscape, encompasses the famed and beautiful Clent Hills, a large area of which is owned and managed by the National Trust. We must also consider the Hagley Hall Estate which includes a large proportion of Wychbury Hill, the importance of which was acknowledged in the 18th Century by George Lyttelton in his creation of Hagley Park which is now a Grade 1 Listed Garden. On Wychbury Hill are two significant follies, ‘The Temple of Theseus’ and ‘The Obelisk’, tastefully exploiting the landscape prominence of the hill and the presence of the fort.

The whole of this area, including that within Dudley Borough, is of regional importance as an amenity asset for the wellbeing of, and enjoyment by, a large population. We personally spend many hours of enjoyment walking in these areas, appreciating their beauty and the fresh air. It would be so simple to

seriously, and hence permanently, damage the area with inappropriate developments and associated infrastructure.

Support

Representation ID: 46170

Received: 17/08/2021

Respondent: Jill Parkes

Number of people: 2

We wish to support Dudley Councils proposed protection of the Green Belt in
Halesowen , incorporating Tack Farm, Coombeswood, Lutley and Foxcote.
We have enjoyed this historic countryside for the past 60years, so uplifting to explore
these natural open spaces and taking de-stressing walks ,in particular during the
recent pandemic.
These areas of Green Belt are available to everyone and are well supported with walk
leaflets.
We also feel it is so important to preserve the woodlands, hedgerows and fields which
encourage wildlife , our legacy for future generations to explore.

Comment

Representation ID: 46171

Received: 19/08/2021

Respondent: Kate Bennett

In Wyre Forest one industrial park was cleared for housing and the tenants moved to vacant units across the district.
Whilst this may not always be practical it is something that should be considered particularly somewhere like North Street Brierley Hill where there is an industrial estate mixed in with housing and a derelict factory unit (where recent murders took place) a few yards away.
Could a scheme be offered making loans to owners to convert these spaces into accommodation?Many houses have historically been converted into offices and this should no longer be allowed, if they can be converted instead into apartments.
There are plenty of office suites available without losing further dwellings.There are a number of small pieces of land that could be bought into use by collaboration with small building firms rather than the large building companies who have had a very easy and profitable few years.I have seen large houses being knocked down and replaced with several homes and unless they are of historical importance this could be encouraged I am not a building expert and have no experience in town planning but in order to save what little green space we have left in Dudley please don't be lazy and think outside the box and leave no stone unturned before it's too late.

Object

Representation ID: 46208

Received: 10/10/2021

Respondent: Mr Bryan Gould

[Three Fields - LGS]

3) Site: ID 10511, Three Fields. Objection to this site not being designated as a Local Green Space: Meets criteria for LGS. Designation would demonstrate significance to the community.

Object

Representation ID: 46209

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mrs Amanda Everton

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS

Objection to The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p. 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

The Three Fields meets all of Part A criteria for a Local Green Space, including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community”, as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations.

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a ‘green gym’. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a ‘sense of community’ amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; “if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space”, and suggests that since the site is green belt, “there would not be any additional local benefits” in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can “help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community” (“Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space”, HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, “green belts do not recognise… the community value of land” (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply ‘green belt’. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton).

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night. There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills. The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise”, HMG 2019, para. 8).

Object

Representation ID: 46210

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mrs Anu Sahota

[Three Fields - LGS]

I/WE OBJECT TO THREE FIELDS NOT BEING DESIGNATED AS A ‘LOCAL
GREEN SPACE’ FOR THESE REASONS: Site reference number: Site ID 10511, The
Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS (site ID number as it appears in the Site Assessment
Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p. 534).
This is a comment on an unallocated site, which was assessed for a LGS Designation
in the Site Assessment Report.
Local Green Space: This site meets all of Part A criteria, and sufficient of Part B
criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) to meet national criteria for a Local Green Space.
The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; "if land is already
protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any
additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space", and
suggests that since the site is green belt, "there would not be any additional local
benefits" in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).
However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green
belts a LGS designation can "help to identify areas that are of particular importance to
the local community” (“Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of
way and local green space”, HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself
does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have
above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, “green belts do not
recognise... the community value of land” (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134).
A LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local
community and its local significance beyond that of being simply ‘green belt’.
Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other
hedges in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC,
Norton).
Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil
areas as it fulfils the criteria listed above.

Object

Representation ID: 46211

Received: 07/10/2021

Respondent: Mrs Anna Partridge

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS

Objection to The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p. 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria, including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community”, as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application.
The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations.

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a ‘green gym’. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a ‘sense of community’ amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; “if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space”, and suggests that since the site is green belt, “there would not be any additional local benefits” in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can “help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community” (“Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space”, HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, “green belts do not recognise… the community value of land” (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply ‘green belt’. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night. There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills. The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise”, HMG 2019, para. 8).

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed.
Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton).

Object

Representation ID: 46212

Received: 10/10/2021

Respondent: Ann Dixon

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS

Objection to The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, sec on A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p. 534).
This is a comment on an unallocated site.
While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.
Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria, including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community”, as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations.
The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a ‘green gym’. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a ‘sense of community’ amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.
The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; “if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space”, and suggests that since the site is green belt, “there would not be any additional local benefits” in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).
However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can “help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community” (“Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space”, HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, “green belts do not recognise… the community value of land” (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply ‘green belt’. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.
Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night. There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills. The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise”, HMG 2019, para. 8).
Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton).

Object

Representation ID: 46213

Received: 05/10/2021

Respondent: Deborah Palmer

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS

Objection to The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, sec on A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p. 534).
This is a comment on an unallocated site.
While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.
Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria, including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community”, as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations.
The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a ‘green gym’. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a ‘sense of community’ amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.
The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; “if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space”, and suggests that since the site is green belt, “there would not be any additional local benefits” in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).
However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can “help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community” (“Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space”, HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, “green belts do not recognise… the community value of land” (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply ‘green belt’. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.
Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night. There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills. The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise”, HMG 2019, para. 8).
Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton).

Object

Representation ID: 46214

Received: 05/10/2021

Respondent: Darren Ford

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS
Objection to The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community” as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a 'green gym'. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a 'sense of community' amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; "if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space", and suggests that since the site is green belt, "there would not be any additional local benefits" in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can "help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community" ("Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space", HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, "green belts do not recognise… the community value of land" (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply 'green belt'. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise” HMG 2019, para. 8).

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton)

Object

Representation ID: 46215

Received: 07/10/2021

Respondent: Mark Prior

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS
Objection to The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community” as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a 'green gym'. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a 'sense of community' amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; "if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space", and suggests that since the site is green belt, "there would not be any additional local benefits" in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can "help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community" ("Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space", HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, "green belts do not recognise… the community value of land" (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply 'green belt'. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise” HMG 2019, para. 8).

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton)

Object

Representation ID: 46216

Received: 05/10/2021

Respondent: Matthew Yarnall

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS
Objection to The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community” as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a 'green gym'. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a 'sense of community' amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; "if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space", and suggests that since the site is green belt, "there would not be any additional local benefits" in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can "help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community" ("Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space", HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, "green belts do not recognise… the community value of land" (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply 'green belt'. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise” HMG 2019, para. 8).

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton)

Object

Representation ID: 46217

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Martin Deeley

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS
Objection to The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community” as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a 'green gym'. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a 'sense of community' amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; "if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space", and suggests that since the site is green belt, "there would not be any additional local benefits" in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can "help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community" ("Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space", HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, "green belts do not recognise… the community value of land" (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply 'green belt'. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise” HMG 2019, para. 8).

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton)

Object

Representation ID: 46218

Received: 05/10/2021

Respondent: Richard Vere

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS
Objection to The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community” as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a 'green gym'. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a 'sense of community' amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; "if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space", and suggests that since the site is green belt, "there would not be any additional local benefits" in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can "help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community" ("Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space", HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, "green belts do not recognise… the community value of land" (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply 'green belt'. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise” HMG 2019, para. 8).

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton)

Object

Representation ID: 46219

Received: 05/10/2021

Respondent: Ms Christine Allen

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS
Objection to The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p. 534).
This is a comment on an unallocated site.
While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A: Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.
Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria, including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community”, as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations.
The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a ‘green gym’. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers and encourages a ‘sense of community’ amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.
The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; “if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space”, and suggests that since the site is green belt, “there would not be any additional local benefits” in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).
However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can “help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community” (“Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space”, HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, “green belts do not recognise… the community value of land” (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply ‘green belt’. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.
Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night. There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills. The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong.
The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise”, HMG 2019, para. 8).
Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton). These hedgerows are full to the brim with sparrows. I have never heard such noisy hedges before. The birds must never be disturbed and must be protected.

Object

Representation ID: 46220

Received: 06/10/2021

Respondent: Ms Rachel Pugh

3) Site: ID 10511, Three Fields. Objection to this site not being designated as a Local Green Space: Meets criteria for LGS.

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS

Objection to The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p. 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

The Three Fields meets all of Part A criteria for a Local Green Space, including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community”, as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations.

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a ‘green gym’. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a ‘sense of community’ amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; “if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space”, and suggests that since the site is green belt, “there would not be any additional local benefits” in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can “help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community” (“Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space”, HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, “green belts do not recognise… the community value of land” (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply ‘green belt’. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton).

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night. There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills. The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise”, HMG 2019, para. 8). less

Object

Representation ID: 46221

Received: 10/10/2021

Respondent: Mr Edward Cook

Site: ID 10511, Three Fields. Objection to this site not being designated as a Local Green Space: Meets criteria for LGS. Designation would demonstrate significance to the community.


Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS

Objection to The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p. 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

The Three Fields meets all of Part A criteria for a Local Green Space, including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community”, as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations.

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a ‘green gym’. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a ‘sense of community’ amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; “if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space”, and suggests that since the site is green belt, “there would not be any additional local benefits” in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can “help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community” (“Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space”, HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, “green belts do not recognise… the community value of land” (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply ‘green belt’. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton).

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night. There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills. The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise”, HMG 2019, para. 8).

Object

Representation ID: 46222

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Ms Clara Wood

I object to Site ID 10511 (Three Fields, Dunsley Road, Norton) not being designated as a Local Green Space. It meets all LGS criteria and has community significance

Object

Representation ID: 46223

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Mr William Cook

Site: ID 10511, Three Fields. Objection to this site not being designated as a Local Green Space: Meets criteria for LGS. Designation would demonstrate significance to the community.

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS

Objection to The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p. 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

The Three Fields meets all of Part A criteria for a Local Green Space, including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community”, as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations.

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a ‘green gym’. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a ‘sense of community’ amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; “if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space”, and suggests that since the site is green belt, “there would not be any additional local benefits” in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can “help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community” (“Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space”, HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, “green belts do not recognise… the community value of land” (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply ‘green belt’. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton).

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night. There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills. The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise”, HMG 2019, para. 8).

Object

Representation ID: 46224

Received: 10/10/2021

Respondent: Abby Rose

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS
Objection to The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p. 534).
This is a comment on an unallocated site.
While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.
Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria, including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community”, as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations.
The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a ‘green gym’. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a ‘sense of community’ amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.
The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; “if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space”, and suggests that since the site is green belt, “there would not be any additional local benefits” in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).
However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can “help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community” (“Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space”, HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, “green belts do not recognise… the community value of land” (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply ‘green belt’. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.
Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night. There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills. The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise”, HMG 2019, para. 8).
Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton).

Object

Representation ID: 46225

Received: 06/10/2021

Respondent: Amanda Mumford

[LGS - Flint Field]

I support the application by Friends of Homer Hill Park and Cradley Then & Now for designation of Local Green Space for Site ID 10522 The Flint Field, Land North of Oldnall Road, Cradley & Wollescote. The area is a special place for the community and holds particular local significance because of its natural beauty, tranquillity, wild life, archaeology, history and recreational value. Its size and character is different to neighbouring or other greenbelt land in Cradley or Wollescote. A visit there for recreation is a different experience to visiting anywhere else in the locality, which is demonstrated by organised walks, and the support of the Black Country Society. It’s appreciated for its breathtaking views over the Black Country, and its secluded, private areas, quite different to the much larger fields overlooked by the farm and farm buildings to the south of Oldnall Road or the enclosing, towering treescape of Caslon Wood.

Object

Representation ID: 46226

Received: 06/10/2021

Respondent: Amanda Mumford

[LGS - Three Fields]

I also support the Local Green Space application for the Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS, Site ID 10511, on its assessment for beauty and recreation,

Object

Representation ID: 46228

Received: 07/10/2021

Respondent: Lucie Christie

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS

Objection to The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site
ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green
Space, from p. 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it
appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt
designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for
development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should
be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A
criteria, including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it
serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community”, as evidenced by the
supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used
by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a
tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining
community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations.

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and
therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space.
Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to
local identity, character of the area and a sense of place.
Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular
with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a ‘green gym’. It forms part of a wider green
corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and
encourages a ‘sense of community’ amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children,
for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised
social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and
community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; “if land is already protected by
Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would
be gained by designations as local green space”, and suggests that since the site is green belt,
“there would not be any additional local benefits” in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of
Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS
designation can “help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community”
(“Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space”, HMG
2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the
local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt.
Specifically, “green belts do not recognise… the community value of land” (Neighbourhood Planning,
2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt
sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local
community and its local significance beyond that of being simply ‘green belt’. This site should
therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The
site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the
countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent
fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night.
There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills. The dominant
soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect
tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their
recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines
on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human
sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of
birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise”, HMG 2019, para. 8).

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the
locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton).

Object

Representation ID: 46229

Received: 07/10/2021

Respondent: Lucy Hingley-Stewart

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS

Objection to The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site
ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green
Space, from p. 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.


While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it
appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt
designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for
development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should
be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A
criteria, including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it
serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community”, as evidenced by the
supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used
by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a
tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining
community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations.

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and
therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space.
Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to
local identity, character of the area and a sense of place.
Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular
with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a ‘green gym’. It forms part of a wider green
corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and
encourages a ‘sense of community’ amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children,
for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised
social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and
community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; “if land is already protected by
Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would
be gained by designations as local green space”, and suggests that since the site is green belt,
“there would not be any additional local benefits” in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of
Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS
designation can “help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community”
(“Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space”, HMG
2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the
local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt.
Specifically, “green belts do not recognise… the community value of land” (Neighbourhood Planning,
2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt
sites for

development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community
and its local significance beyond that of being simply ‘green belt’. This site should therefore be
granted a Local Green Space designation.

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The
site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the
countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent
fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night.
There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills. The dominant
soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect
tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their
recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines
on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human
sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of
birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise”, HMG 2019, para. 8).

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the
locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton).

Object

Representation ID: 46230

Received: 05/10/2021

Respondent: Ms Catherine Cooley

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS
Objection to The Three Fields, Norton, DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space
Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites
Assessed for Local Green Space, from p. 534).
This is a comment on an unallocated site.
While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference
SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and
its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the
pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites
which have particular significance and importance to the local community
should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green
Space.
Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all
of Part A criteria, including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the
community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community”, as
evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The
site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from
all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local
area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to
future generations.
The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and
Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space.
Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and
contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place.
Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50
years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a ‘green
gym’. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the
wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a ‘sense of
community’ amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for
informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the
past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities
as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the
local natural environment.
The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; “if land is already
protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether
any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green
space”, and suggests that since the site is green belt, “there would not be any
additional local benefits” in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).
However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within
green belts a LGS designation can “help to identify areas that are of particular
importance to the local community” (“Open space, sports and recreation
facilities, public rights of way and local green space”, HMG 2014, Para: 010).
Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the
local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the
green belt. Specifically, “green belts do not recognise… the community value of
land” (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing
pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for
development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site
to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply
‘green belt’. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space
designation.
Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas.
The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the
countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in
adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars
at night. There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills.
The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should
“identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and
are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)).
The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively
undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area”
with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise”, HMG 2019, para. 8).
Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other
hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane
SLINC, Norton).

Object

Representation ID: 46231

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Ms Joanne Ford

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS
Objection to The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community” as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a 'green gym'. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a 'sense of community' amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; "if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space", and suggests that since the site is green belt, "there would not be any additional local benefits" in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can "help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community" ("Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space", HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, "green belts do not recognise… the community value of land" (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply 'green belt'. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise” HMG 2019, para. 8).

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton)

Object

Representation ID: 46232

Received: 11/10/2021

Respondent: Ms Jayne Deeley

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS
Objection to The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community” as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a 'green gym'. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a 'sense of community' amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; "if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space", and suggests that since the site is green belt, "there would not be any additional local benefits" in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can "help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community" ("Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space", HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, "green belts do not recognise… the community value of land" (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply 'green belt'. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise” HMG 2019, para. 8).

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton)

Object

Representation ID: 46233

Received: 05/10/2021

Respondent: Ms Jane Edwards

Site: ID 10511, The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS
Objection to The Three Fields, Norton DY8 3LS not receiving a Local Green Space Designation (site ID 10511 as it appears in the Site Assessment Report, section A-6: Sites Assessed for Local Green Space, from p 534).

This is a comment on an unallocated site.

While I support the non-allocation of the Three Fields, Norton (site reference SA-0076-DUD as it appears in Appendix A:Dudley) in the Draft Local Plan and its continued protection under green belt designation, I believe that due to the pressure on local authorities to release green belt land for development, sites which have particular significance and importance to the local community should be identified and protected by the additional designation of Local Green Space.

Three Fields meets criteria for the designation of Local Green Space. It meets all of Part A criteria including being ‘local in character’ and is in ‘close proximity to the community it serves’ (NPPF). The site is “demonstrably special to the local community” as evidenced by the supporting evidence submitted alongside the original LGS application. The site is extensively used by the local community, is important to residents of all ages and from all groups, regarded as a tremendous community amenity seen as adding value to the local area, important for maintaining community spirit, and an asset that should be passed on to future generations

The site has been assessed as meeting two of the Part B criteria (Beauty, and Recreation) and therefore meets national criteria for a Local Green Space. Beauty: The site is visually attractive, offers magnificent panoramic views, and contributes to local identity, character of the area and a sense of place. Recreational value: The site has been used for informal recreation for over 50 years, is popular with walkers, cyclists, and those using the site as a 'green gym'. It forms part of a wider green corridor and offers walkers access to the wider countryside. It is used by dog walkers, and encourages a 'sense of community' amongst the socially isolated. It is very popular with children, for informal recreation, games, and nature study. The site has been used in the past for organised social activities and could be used again for similar activities as well as by local schools and community groups in activities related to the local natural environment.

The Site Assessment summary for this site quotes the NPPF; "if land is already protected by Greenbelt Policy then consideration should be given to whether any additional local benefits would be gained by designations as local green space", and suggests that since the site is green belt, "there would not be any additional local benefits" in designating the site a LGS (p. 537 of Appendix A).

However, Government guidance on LGS designation states that even within green belts a LGS designation can "help to identify areas that are of particular importance to the local community" ("Open space, sports and recreation facilities, public rights of way and local green space", HMG 2014, Para: 010). Green Belt designation itself does not recognise any additional value to the local community which a site may have above the five stated purposes of the green belt. Specifically, "green belts do not recognise… the community value of land" (Neighbourhood Planning, 2019, para.134). Given the ever-growing pressure exerted on local authorities to release Green Belt sites for development, a LGS designation would demonstrate the importance of this site to the local community and its local significance beyond that of being simply 'green belt'. This site should therefore be granted a Local Green Space designation.

Tranquillity: This site should be protected under Policy GB1 (4) on protecting tranquil areas. The site is experienced as a natural space, and is described by visitors as a ‘piece of the countryside’. It is often possible to observe and listen to the sounds of farm animals in adjacent fields. It is possible to enjoy sunrise and sunsets, and because of Dark Skies, the stars at night There are extensive views over local countryside, fields, woodland and distant hills The dominant soundscape is that of birdsong. The NPPF states that planning policies should “identify and protect tranquil areas which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise and are prized for their recreational and amenity value for this reason” (NPPF 2019, para 180(b)). The government guidelines on what constitutes a tranquil place is that it is “relatively undisturbed by noise from human sources that undermine the intrinsic character of the area” with a positive soundscape for e.g. of birdsong. (“Guidance: Noise” HMG 2019, para. 8).

Designations: The site has mature hedgerows which should be surveyed. Other hedgerows in the locality recently received SLINC protection (Racecourse Lane SLINC, Norton)